Post-Publication Discussion Policy

Jurnal Masyarakat Pariwisata (MP)

Jurnal Masyarakat Pariwisata (MP) recognizes the importance of scholarly discussion, constructive feedback, and continuous improvement in advancing knowledge and practice in community service and tourism development. The journal encourages responsible post-publication discussion to promote academic dialogue, strengthen the quality of published work, and maintain the integrity of the scholarly record.

This policy provides a mechanism for readers, authors, researchers, practitioners, and other interested parties to raise questions, provide comments, or report concerns regarding articles published in the journal.

1. Scope of Post-Publication Discussion

Post-publication discussion may address issues related to the content, methodology, interpretation, findings, and implications of published articles. Relevant topics include, but are not limited to:

The methodology and implementation of community service activities.
The interpretation and validity of reported results.
The relevance and applicability of findings to community empowerment and tourism development.
The sustainability and potential impact of reported community service programs.
The accuracy of data, references, photographs, and other supporting materials.
Potential errors, inconsistencies, or ethical concerns identified after publication.
Opportunities for further research, collaboration, and improvement in community service practices.

All contributions should be relevant to the published work and presented in a professional, evidence-based, and constructive manner.

2. Submission of Comments and Discussions

Readers who wish to comment on a published article may contact the editorial team of Jurnal Masyarakat Pariwisata (MP) through the journal's official communication channels.

Submissions should include:

The title and, where available, the DOI or URL of the article being discussed.
The name and institutional affiliation of the contributor, where applicable.
A clear explanation of the issues, observations, or questions raised.
Supporting evidence or references when necessary.
The contributor's contact information for editorial correspondence.

The editorial team may request additional information or clarification before considering a contribution for publication.

3. Editorial Assessment

All submitted comments and post-publication discussions are subject to editorial assessment before publication or dissemination through the journal's official channels.

The editor will consider the relevance, accuracy, originality, scholarly value, and tone of the submission. Comments must contribute meaningfully to scholarly discussion and must not contain personal attacks, defamatory statements, discriminatory language, or unsupported allegations.

The journal reserves the right to request revisions, decline submissions that do not meet its standards, or seek independent expert advice when necessary.

4. Responses from Original Authors

When appropriate, the authors of the original article may be invited to respond to comments or questions concerning their published work.

Authors are encouraged to provide clear, evidence-based, and constructive responses. The journal may publish the response alongside the original comment to facilitate balanced academic discussion.

The publication of a comment or response does not necessarily imply that the journal endorses the views expressed.

5. Handling Concerns about Published Articles

If a post-publication comment raises concerns about factual errors, research integrity, plagiarism, data reliability, authorship, or ethical conduct, the editor will assess the matter in accordance with the journal's relevant policies.

Depending on the nature and seriousness of the concern, the journal may:

Request clarification or supporting documentation from the authors.
Consult independent experts or reviewers.
Publish a correction when an error is confirmed.
Issue an expression of concern when further investigation is required.
Retract an article when the evidence and circumstances justify retraction.

All concerns will be handled fairly and objectively, with due consideration for the rights and responsibilities of the parties involved.

6. Ethical Standards for Discussion

Contributors participating in post-publication discussions must uphold academic integrity and professional conduct. They must:

Present comments honestly and accurately.
Support substantive claims with relevant evidence where possible.
Respect the rights, privacy, and dignity of authors, research participants, and community members.
Disclose relevant conflicts of interest.
Avoid plagiarism, misrepresentation, harassment, and personal attacks.
Respect confidentiality and applicable ethical requirements when discussing information obtained through community service activities.

The journal may decline or remove contributions that violate these standards, subject to its editorial procedures and applicable policies.

7. Transparency and Accessibility

Jurnal Masyarakat Pariwisata (MP) aims to ensure that substantive post-publication discussions and editorial actions are documented transparently when appropriate.

Where comments and responses are formally published, the journal may link them to the relevant article to help readers understand the discussion and any resulting corrections or clarifications.

The journal is committed to maintaining an accurate scholarly record while encouraging constructive engagement among academics, community service practitioners, tourism professionals, and the wider public.

8. Commitment to Scholarly Dialogue

Jurnal Masyarakat Pariwisata (MP) welcomes responsible scholarly dialogue that contributes to the advancement of community service practices, community empowerment, and sustainable tourism development.

Through this policy, the journal seeks to encourage critical discussion, facilitate the correction of errors, and strengthen trust in the integrity and value of its published content.